the change

10/19/2016

After listening to and discussing this podcast with your group, please answer the following questions in complete sentences in a comment AS A GROUP. You can do this in one post or in several posts. When the post asks for your NAME, please put your HOUR - nothing more!

Before listening, what were your predictions based on the title?
What are 2-3 things you liked about this podcast?
What are 2-3 things that could be improved about this podcast?
What did you think about the sound effects? Were they effective or could they be improved?
Was the title creative, did it connect to the story, or should it be changed? If it should be changed, what are some suggestions you would have?

Please talk to Ms. Boyer if you have any questions.

8 Comments

10/20/2016 08:44:10 am

1. We think that the podcast will be about a big change in a persons life.

10/20/2016 08:46:47 am

2. the music in the background. She described what and how she was feeling.

10/20/2016 08:48:10 am

3. There was shuffling. The music stops a couple of times

10/20/2016 08:49:09 am

4. They could be improved the only sound effects that where they were the music.

Group G-H

10/21/2016 09:06:36 am

Your podcast was very good. The music fit the tone perfect, and you read with emotion. The whole podcast flowed very well. There really is no bad comments to make.

D-H

10/24/2016 07:40:29 am

Hour 2

1) When we first saw the title, we thought the podcast would be about how twins can be totally different people, even if they look the same.
2) One thing we liked about the podcast was how she switched between voices, with each character almost. Also, she felt very strongly about her topic, so we as the listeners felt compelled to listen until the end.
3) While the author did many character changes, most of them were extremely choppy. Also, the author was a bit impolite to the other twin, almost abrasive. This made the podcast uncomfortable because it felt as if you were in the middle of an unsettled family argument.
4) We think the podcast could use more sound effects. If there were any sound effects in the podcast, they were not noticeable.
5) We do think the title was good for this podcast and that it directly connected with the story.

D-H

10/24/2016 07:43:22 am

That was meant for another podcast. This is the correct post:

Hour 2
1) When we first saw the title, we thought this podcast would be about something in the family changing, like a new baby.
2) One thing we liked about the podcast was how the speaker gave the exact emotion she was feeling. When she was sad we felt sad too. We also liked all the sounds in the background, like the music.
3) There was some out of place background noise, like there was something happening during the recording of this podcast.
4) The sounds were timed very well and were directly connected to the context around it.
5) The title was well thought out, as it made sense with the story and it drew listeners in.

Group E-H

10/24/2016 04:59:41 pm

1. We thought the story was going to be about someone moving.
2. The music was really good and the words were well spoken and enunciated. I liked how the author turned a negative into a positive at the end.
3. I wouldn't change anything about the podcast.
4. The sound effects were really effective. They helped create emotion and make the listen feel something.
5. The title was well thought out and connected well to the story.

the change

Leave a Reply.

ELA 2 & ELA 7th

Archives

Categories