Two very experienced Baltimore City detectives were assigned to investigate Adnan's case. He had a high paid, well experienced attorney, and he was still found guilty of murder.
If you were the prosecuation (against Adnan), what evidence would/could be used to prove his guilt? Present the evidence and explain how it can help prove he is guilty. List the Episode you used to pull the information (can use Episodes 1-3).
Remember: Once a peer has used a specific piece of evidence, you cannot use that same evidence. You must go find another piece and look at it from a different angle.
Make sure you are checking for grammatical errors and fragments. Make sure your posts make sense to your audience - read them before you hit submit.
You need to respond to a classmate's post; however, you must find faulty reasoning in their evidence. Explain why their proposal is wrong, inaccurate, or not plausible.
If you were the prosecuation (against Adnan), what evidence would/could be used to prove his guilt? Present the evidence and explain how it can help prove he is guilty. List the Episode you used to pull the information (can use Episodes 1-3).
Remember: Once a peer has used a specific piece of evidence, you cannot use that same evidence. You must go find another piece and look at it from a different angle.
Make sure you are checking for grammatical errors and fragments. Make sure your posts make sense to your audience - read them before you hit submit.
You need to respond to a classmate's post; however, you must find faulty reasoning in their evidence. Explain why their proposal is wrong, inaccurate, or not plausible.